SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 3791

KARUNA NAND BAJPAYEE
Sudeep Singh Chauhan – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :- Dharmendra Pratap Singh
For the Respondent:- G.A.

JUDGMENT

Karuna Nand Bajpayee,J.

Ref: - Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 287595 of 2016.

Counter affidavit on behalf of the State filed today is taken on record.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. Perused the record.

3. Submission of the counsel for the appellant is that according to the medical examination, the age of the victim was found of about 17 years at the time of incident. Further submission is that actually she was much above of that age and was fully grown up mature girl. Next submission is that it was admitted by the victim during the course of her statement that she was enticed away by the appellant and was then taken to his house where the applicant's mother, father and brother were all present and she was seen by all the members of appellant's family. She was kept in the parental house of the appellant for a few days and then she was taken to Ahmedabad, Gujarat, hundreds of kilometres away where she lived in a rented room for about two and half months and during this course, sexual relationship were established by the appellant. Submission is that though the allegation of committing rape has been made against the appellant b





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top