SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 3992

RAJAN ROY
Atul Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:- Girish Chandra Verma
For the Respondent:- C.S.C., Manjive Shukla

JUDGMENT

Rajan Roy, J.

Heard.

2. This court on 27.5.2016 had passed the following order:

"Heard.

Claim of the petitioner for promotion on the sole post of Assistant Clerk under Regulation 2(2) of Chapter III of the regulations made under the Intermediate Education Act 1921 has been declined by the District Inspector of Schools (D.I.O.S.), Sitapur solely on the ground that there being a single post the same cannot be filled by promotion (Annexure-1 to the writ petition). Reasoning given is that one post cannot be bifurcated into half for filling up the same. This reasoning has been given by him inspite of the fact that the judgment of a Division Bench of this court passed in the case of Jai Bhagwan Singh v. District Inspector of Schools & ors. (writ petition No.68636 of 2005) reported in (2006)3 UPLBEC 2391 was within the knowledge of the D.I.O.S. as is evident from his letter dated 25.4.2016 written to the Director Education U.P. Moreover, while passing the impugned order though he has referred to Regulation 2(2), but has omitted to mention the 'Note' to the said regulation which categorically provides that while calculating the promotion quota less than half shall be ignored and ha














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top