SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 1661

PANKAJ MITHAL, SHASHI KANT
Pradeep Kumar Tripathi – Appellant
Versus
Satish Kumar & Ohters – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :- Ram Singh,Amit Kumar Sinha,Deepali Srivastava Sinha
For the Respondent:- Nagendra Kumar Srivastava

JUDGMENT

Pankaj Mithal and Shashi Kant, JJ.

The claimant-appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment, order and award dated 29.03.2008 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal in M.A.C.P. No.221 of 2003, Pradeep Kumar Tripathi Vs. Satish Kumar and others, whereby the compensation of Rs.7,78,800/- has been awarded to the petitioner with 6% simple interest per annum from the date of presentation of claim petition i.e. 24.04.2003 till its payment and the respondent no.3 Insurance Company has been directed to satisfy the award and to recover it later from the respondent no.1, the owner of the truck.

2. Heard Sri Amit Kumar Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the claimant-appellant.

3. The appeal is proceeding ex-parte against the respondents no.1 and 2 in view of the order dated 17.01.2017 as despite deemed service of notice upon them, no one had appeared on their behalf.

4. Respondent no.3 is represented by Sri N.K. Srivastava.

5. The claimant-appellant was working as a driver of U.P. Roadways Bus, which met with an accident on 13.01.2003 with truck no.HR-69-2837














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top