SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 1676

MANOJ MISRA
Vishesh Tyagi – Appellant
Versus
Rajni Tyagi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mohammad Farooque Ansari

JUDGMENT

Manoj Misra, J. -- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The present petition has been filed challenging an order dated 20th January, 2016 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Moradabad in O.S. No.196 of 2013 by which the Impleadment Application No.29-Ga moved by transferee of the property in suit seeking impleadment as a plaintiff has been allowed. The petitioner also challenges the revisional court's order dated 31.08.2016 by which the Civil Revision No.12 of 2016 preferred by the defendant-petitioner against the order allowing impleadment has been dismissed.

3. A perusal of the record would go to show that the plaintiff-respondent instituted O.S. No.196 of 2013 for mandatory injunction seeking eviction of the defendant-petitioner from the suit property as also for mesne profit by claiming that the property in suit had been purchased by the plaintiff through a registered sale deed. It was alleged that the defendant-petitioner had been a licensee and his licence was terminated by a notice dated 31.10.2012. During pendency of the suit, impleadment application No.29-Ga was filed by Vishal Tyagi, Smt. Varsha Tyagi and Smt. Rajbala Tyagi by claiming that the pro



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top