Ritu Raj Awasthi, J. -- Mr. Rohit Jaiswal, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondents no.1 to 8 and 15. Respondents no.1 to 8 and 15 are legal heirs of original landlord, as such, contesting respondents are duly represented.

2. Respondents no.9 to 14 are the legal heirs of original tenant Ramzan and they were the defendants in regular suit filed by the respondents and their interest is same as of the appellant, as such, no notice is required to be issued to them. Notices to them are hereby dispensed.

3. Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned counsel for respondents no.1 to 8 and 15.

4. This second appeal under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 27.10.2016, passed by Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act), Court No.1, Lucknow in Regular Civil Appeal No.4400115 of 2008; Smt. Ramzan (dead) and another Vs. Kishan Lal Sahu (dead) and another as well as against the judgment and decree dated 16.04.2008 passed by IIIrd Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No.35, Lucknow in Regular Suit No.202 of 1992; Ram Charan Sahu (dead) and another Vs. Smt. Ramzan and others.

5. As per giv