SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 1698

SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI
Saransh Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Anupam Kulshreshtha
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Surya Prakash Kesarwani, J. -- Counter and rejoinder affidavits have been filed today, which are taken on record.

2. Heard Sri Anupam Kulshrestha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vishal Tandon, learned standing counsel for the State respondents.

3. Briefly stated, facts of the present case are that by order dated 27.12.2014 in Stamp Case No.84 of 2013-14 (Computerized Case No.D2013015000171) passed by the respondent No.3 under Section 47A(3) of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (hereinafter referred to as ''the Act') with respect to Instrument No.1651 of 2013 relating to sale of certain plots of Khatauni Khata No.214 of village Mant Raja Bangar, Tehsil Mant, District Mathura, deficiency of stamp duty of Rs.4,69,950/- was determined and a penalty of Rs.18,71,800/- was imposed. Interest was also demanded at the prescribed rates. Aggrieved with this order, the petitioner filed a Revision No.74 of 2015 along with a stay application under Section 56 of the Act before the Commissioner, Agra Division, Agra. An order dated 26.02.2015 was passed by the Commissioner, Agra Div


































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top