SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(All) 4123

HARSH KUMAR
Deepak Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant :- Rajeev Kumar Singh Parmar, Abhay Raj Singh, Jitendra Kumar Yadav.
For the Opposite Party :- Sanjay Kumar Singh-Spp

JUDGMENT

Harsh Kumar, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for Union of India and perused the record.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated for the recovery of 32.450 litres of Acetic Anhydride in six containers; that the recovery is alleged to have been made on 2.11.2014 from the two bags of applicant which was found to be Acetic Anhydride upon testing on the spot and was allegedly admitted to be so by the applicant; that manufacture, trade, commerce, possession and consumption of the recovered commodity without unique registration number has been prohibited by way of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Regulation of Controlled Substances) Order, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as "2013 Order") wherein in all the three Schedules-A, B & C the above commodity of Acetic anhydried has been mentioned at No.1 and its manufacture, distribution, sell, purchase, possession, storage, consumption as well as export and import is subject to control as specified in this 2013 Order; that no commercial quantit


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top