HARSH KUMAR
Deepak Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Harsh Kumar, J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for Union of India and perused the record.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated for the recovery of 32.450 litres of Acetic Anhydride in six containers; that the recovery is alleged to have been made on 2.11.2014 from the two bags of applicant which was found to be Acetic Anhydride upon testing on the spot and was allegedly admitted to be so by the applicant; that manufacture, trade, commerce, possession and consumption of the recovered commodity without unique registration number has been prohibited by way of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Regulation of Controlled Substances) Order, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as "2013 Order") wherein in all the three Schedules-A, B & C the above commodity of Acetic anhydried has been mentioned at No.1 and its manufacture, distribution, sell, purchase, possession, storage, consumption as well as export and import is subject to control as specified in this 2013 Order; that no commercial quantit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.