SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 1795

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
(Lucknow Bench)
BEFORE : SHABIHUL HASNAIN AND SHEO KUMAR SINGH-I, JJ.
SAURABH GUPTA AND ANOTHER ....Appellants
Versus
Smt. HASRATI AND ANOTHER ....Respondents
(First Appeal From Order No. 447 of 2015, decided on 12th December, 2017)

Advocates:
Counsel :
Balendu Shekhar and Avnish Mani Tripathi for the Appellants; Bhanu Prakash Dubey for the Respondents.

Headnote:Motor Vehicles Act, 1988—Sections 173, 163-A, 184, 166 and 158—Claim petition—Dismissal—Fatal accident case—Tribunal shifted 100% responsibility of deceased is a case of accident—Challenge against—Deceased aged about 28 years, working as Country Manager and getting Rs. 8,00,000 p.a.—Admittedly, accident took place while deceased was driving vehicle—Death caused due to an accident arising out of use of motor vehicle and Court below wrongly came to conclusion that claimants were not entitled for compensation—Once it is proved that after investigation charge-sheet was filed and truck driver had violated rules and safety norms, offending vehicle is fully responsible for occurrence—Annual income shown in ITR at Rs. 1,79,829 taken for purposes of compensation—In view of Prancy Sethi’s case, Rs. 89914 taken as future prospects—One-third deducted for personal expenses of deceased—Net income assessed at Rs. 1,79,829—Choice of multiplier of 17—Pecuniary damages comes to Rs. 30,57,093—Rs. 15,000 for loss of estate, Rs. 40,000 for loss of consortium and Rs. 15,000 for funeral expenses also added—Amount of compensation held payable at Rs. 31,27,093—Alongwith interest @ 6% p.a.—Direction issued. [Paras 12 to 45]

       Result; Appeal Allowed.

       

Judgement Key Points

What is the scope of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act when death occurs in an accident arising out of the use of a motor vehicle?


JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Sheo Kumar Singh-I, J.—This First Appeal From Order has been preferred under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act against the judgment and order dated 28.2.2015 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Special Judge (E.C.) Act, Lucknow, in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 138 of 2010- Saurav Gupta and another v. Smt. Hasrati and another, whereby the claim petition filed by the claimants was dismissed by the learned Tribunal shifting 100% responsibility of the deceased in a case of accident.

2. Aggrieved by the order of the learned Tribunal, this appeal has been filed with the contention that the learned Tribunal has erred in deciding the case shifting 100% liability on the deceased.

3. The brief facts giving rise to filing of the present appeal are that Priyanka Negi was coming from Delhi to Lucknow with her husband Saurav Gupta, appellant No. 1, and his friend Vaibhav with Car No. DL 03 TC (SZ) 809 and when she reached near Ravi Filling Station falling in territorial jurisdiction of Police Station Fatehganj East in Bareilly on Delhi- Lucknow National Highway, collided with the vehicle Truck No. HR 63 A 5656 parked by the Driver in the wrong direction without any indicator, parking light or reflector, causing serious injuries to Priyanka Negi, who died later on due to injuries sustained in the accident. Saurav Gupta also sustained injuries and after preliminary treatment she was discharged from the hospital. After the incident, the driver of the truck left the vehicle and flew away. The deceased Priyanka Negi was about 28 years’ old at the time of accident and was working as Country Manager and getting a salary of Rs.8,00,000/- per annum. The First Information Report was lodged at the Police Station Fatehganj East in District Bareilly and after investigation, the charge-sheet was filed before the Court. The appellants Saurav Gupta and Smt. Laxmi Devi, husband and mother-in-law of the deceased, filed claim petition before the learned Tribunal and the learned Tribunal, after considering the pleadings of the parties, framed five issues to the effect that as to whether on 27.2.2010 at about 4.30 a.m. near Ravi Filling Station Police Station Fatehganj East in District Bareilly the vehicle Truck was negligently parked in the wrong side in violation of the rules causing serious injuries to Priyanka Negi who died due to the accident and as to whether the Truck driver had a valid and effective driving license at the time of accident and as to whether the Truck was insured at that time. Issue No. 4 was framed to the effect as to whether the driver of the Car was negligent and as to what relief the claimants are entitled. After going through the record and evidence, learned Tribunal analyzed that it was the fault of the driver of the Car who had not stopped the vehicle even after seeing the Truck from a distance of at least 500 meters and if the driver of the Car had taken proper care and attention and had used the brake, the accident could have been avoided. The Tribunal found the driver of the Car fully responsible for causing injuries and thus dismissed the petition.

4. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that the accident took place during the use of motor vehicle and the claimants are fully entitled for claim. It is admitted case that the accident took place while the deceased was driving the vehicle and was coming Delhi to Lucknow and she died due to injuries sustained in the accident. There is no dispute that the deceased was 28 years’ of age at the time of accident and was a working woman. It is also not in dispute that after investigation the police had submitted charge-sheet against the driver of the Truck involved in this accident.

5. Learned counsel for the Insurance Company has submitted that the accident did not take place due to any negligence on the part of the driver of the Truck or the












































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top