SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 1861

SIDDHARTH
NATHU RAM – Appellant
Versus
THAKUR RAMJANKI JI VIRAJMAN MANDIR, CHITRAKOOT – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
J.H. Khan and Gulrez Khan for the Petitioner; Anuj Agrawal for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

Heard Sri Gulrez Khan, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anuj Agrawal, learned Counsel for the respondents.

The petitioner has filed the above noted writ petition praying for the quashing of the Judgment and Decree dated 31.03.2011, passed by Civil Judge (Senior Division), Chitrakoot in SCC Suit No.05 of 2008 and the revisional order dated 28.05.2012, passed by Additional District Judge, Court No.2, Chitrakoot in SCC Revision No.01 of 2011.

The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is tenant of a shop belonging to a private religious Institution, Thakur Ram Janki Ji Virajman Mandir, situated at Bazar Basarbahi, Qasba Manikpur, Tehsil Karvi, Post Manikpur, District Chitrakoot. After service of notice under Section 106 of Transfer of Property Act, read with Section 20(2) of U.P. Act No.13 of 1972 alleging arrears of rent and material alteration in shop in dispute, SCC Suit No.05 of 2008 was instituted by the respondent against the petitioner. The petitioner deposited the admitted rent under Section 20(4) of the U.P.Act No.13 of 1972 and the aforesaid amount was withdrawn bythe respondents. After exchange of pleadings the following issues


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top