SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 1977

OM PRAKASH VII
Moti Ram @ Moonga Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ashish Gupta

JUDGMENT :

1. The present application has been filed by the applicants under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with the prayer to stay operation of the order dated 3.6.2017 passed in Revision No. 322 of 2016 (Moonga Lal and another Vs. State of U.P. and another) by the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Court No. 11, Bareilly as well as the order dated 2.7.2016 passed in complaint case no. 1212 of 2016 (Pooran Dei Vs. Moonga Lal and another), under Section 376-D and 506 IPC, Police Station Mahila Thana, Sadar, district Bareilly by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bareilly.

2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned AGA appearing for the State.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that initially F.I.R. was lodged on 19.10.2014 on the basis of the order passed on the application filed under Section 156 (3) Cr.PC. Offence took place on 19.8.2014. Medical examination was done on 20.10.2014. Nothing was found in the medical report to show that the offence under Section 376-D IPC was committed. Investigating officer during investigation submitted final report. On protest petition being filed by the victim, concerned Magistrate treating the protest petition as complai






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top