ANIL KUMAR, DAYA SHANKAR TRIPATHI
Arun Kumar Srivastava – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh Principal Secretary, Irrigation Depar – Respondent
Heard Sri S.K. Singh, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Amar Chaudhary, learned counsel for respondents and perused the record.
2. Facts in brief of the present case are that petitioner was initially appointed on the post of Junior Clerk in the Irrigation Department, State of U.P. promoted from the post of Senior Clerk on 01.09.1989. After attaining the age of superannuation, he retired from service on 31.01.2007.
3. After retirement from service, petitioner made a representation on 21.04.2014 that he may be promoted to the post of Junior Clerk to the post of Senior Clerk from 18.01.1975 when his junior Sri Vinod Kumar Bhatnagar has been promoted on the ground that the said fact has come to his knowledge on 20.01.2014.
4. When no heed paid, the petitioner approached Public Service Tribunal by filing Claim Petition No. 2135/2016 (Arun Kumar Srivastava Vs. State of U.P. and others) with a prayer that the official respondent may be directed to promote him from the post of Junior Clerk to the post of Senior Clerk from 18.01.1975 when his junior Sri Vinod Kumar Bhatnagar was promoted with all consequential benefits.
5. After exchange of the pleadings between the parties, the Tri
C. Jacob Vs. Director of Geology and Mining and another
New Delhi Municipal Council Vs. Pan Singh and others
P.S. Sadasivasway Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Rup Diamonds Vs. Union of India
State of Orissa and another Vs. Mamata Mohanty
State of Orissa V. Arun Kumar Patnaik
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.