SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 1995

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Surya Prakash Kesarwani, J.
Gangadeen - Petitioner
Vs.
State Of U.P. & Others - Respondent
WRIT - C No. - 50041 of 2017
Decided On : 31-10-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Rahul Mishra,Brajesh Nath Rai
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Anuj Kumar

Entitlement to the benefit under clause (dd) of Sub-section (1) of Section 76 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.

Headnote:

U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act - Lease Cancellation - Section 176A(2) of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, 1950 - Section 76(1)(dd) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was granted a lease as Asami for a land, which was later cancelled citing Section 176A(2) of the U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, 1950. The petitioner challenged the cancellation through a writ petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner's name was recorded in the annual register (khatauni) of 1407 Fasli, entitling him to the benefit conferred under clause (dd) of Sub-section (1) of Section 76 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The impugned orders were quashed, and the case was remitted back for fresh consideration.

Issues: Cancellation of lease, entitlement under U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, 1950, and U.P. Revenue Code, 2006

Ratio Decidendi: The petitioner's entitlement to the benefit under clause (dd) of Sub-section (1) of Section 76 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 was the key factor influencing the court's decision.

Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, and the impugned orders were quashed, remitting the case back for fresh consideration.

JUDGMENT :

Surya Prakash Kesarwani, J.

Heard Sri Rahul Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Abhishek Shukla, learned Standing Counsel for the State-Respondents.

2. Briefly stated facts of the present case are that undisputedly the petitioner was granted a lease as Asami by the Assistant Collector of the Tehsil concerned on 07.12.1993. His name was entered in the khatauni as Assami which continued in khatauni till the year 1411-1416 Fasli. There is no dispute that the petitioner remained in possession of the Khasra Plot No.233 measuring 0.216 hectares and Khasra Plot No.256-ka measuring 0.136 hectares, total area 0.352 hectares of village Kaimaha, Pargana, Tehsil and District Mahoba, in respect of which the aforesaid lease was granted to him. He was also paying revenue to the Government amounting to Rs.3.35. His lease was cancelled by the respondent No.3 vide order dated 28.11.2008 on the ground that in view of the provisions of Section 176A(2) of the U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, 1950, the period of lease granted to an Asami cannot exceed five years. The Revision No.132/72 of 2008-09 filed by the petitioner was dismissed by the Additional Commissioner (I), Chitrakoot Dham Division, Banda by order dated 19.02.2010. Aggrieved with these two orders, petitioner has filed the present writ petition.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in evidence, the petitioner has filed Kisan Bahi, Agenda dated 14.04.1990, Munadi dated 21.04.1990, Z.A. Form 58 and a copy of proceeding dated 21.04.1990 to establish that he is Asankramniya bhumidhar of the leased land. In oral evidence, he produced the then Village Pradhan of the Village. The respondent No.3 called for the original record of the lease allotment and recorded a finding that lease was granted to the petitioner as Asami and, therefore, its term cannot exceed beyond five years. Consequently, he directed the name of the petitioner to be struck off from the Khatauni of 1411-1416 Fasli from Khatauni Khata No.689.

4. It is the case of the petitioner that he is still continuing in possession of the disputed land which is the only source of his livelihood. The contention of the petitioner has also been noted by the respondent No.3 in the impugned order dated 28.11.2008 that the disputed land is the only land held by the petitioner which is not the land covered by Section 132 of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act. This contention of the petitioner has neither been rejected nor any adverse observation has been made either by the respondent No.3 or by the respondent No.2 in the impugned orders. Thus, from the record, it appears that the petitioner is dependent upon the disputed land, which is stated to be in his possession.

5. The provisions of the U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, 1950 have been repealed by the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. Section 76(1)(dd) of the Code is relevant for the purposes of controversy involved in the writ petition, which is reproduced below:

"76. Bhumidhar with non-transferable rights.- (1) Every person belonging to any of the following classes shall be called a bhumidhar with non-transferable rights and shall have all the rights and be subject to all the liabilities conferred or imposed upon such bhumidhar by or under this Code, namely:-

(a) every person who was a bhumidhar with non-transferable rights immediately before the date of commencement of this Code;

(b) every person who is admitted as a bhumidhar with non-transferable rights on or after the said date by the Bhumi Prabandhak Samiti to any land under or in accordance with the provisions of this Code;

(c) every person who is allotted any land on or after the said date under the provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Bhoodan Yajna Act, 1952;

(d) every person who is allotted any land on or after the said date under the provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960;

(dd) every person who was an asami in possession of land not covered by section 77 of this Code, immediately before the date of the commencement









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top