SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 2007

SHAILENDRA KUMAR AGRAWAL
Manohar Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Om Prakash Yadav

JUDGMENT :

SHAILENDRA KUMAR AGRAWAL, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been moved with the prayer to quash the entire proceeding, the impugned order dated 30.06.2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.12, Meerut in criminal revision no.225 of 2014 (Manohar Lal and others Vs. State of U.P.) and also the impugned order dated 23.04.2014 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.6, Meerut in case no.683 of 2013 (State Vs. Manohar Lal and others), under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Hastinapur, District Meerut, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.6, Meerut.

3. The brief facts of the case are that the applicant no.4 Sanjay Kumar was married with the opposite party no.2 Rajrani alias Komal daughter of Somnath, resident of Hastinapur, District Meerut on 28.11.1995. The marriage was solemnized at Hastinapur, District Meerut, Uttar Pradesh. The applicant no.4, Sanjay Kumar, his father Manohar Lal (applicant no.1), brother Chaman Kumar (applicant no.2), mother Smt.





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top