PRASHANT KUMAR JAISWAL vs STATE OF U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2017 Supreme(All) 2115

YASHWANT VARMA
PRASHANT KUMAR JAISWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel :
Sunil Kumar Srivastava, Anand Swaroop Dubey, Ashok Khare, Devendra Saini, Brij Raj, Subhash Chandra Yadav, Purushottam Upadhyaya, V.P. Tripathi, Jaswant Rai, Abhijeet Singh, Abhijat Awasthi, Rajan Babu, Raj Kumar Singh, Baij Nath Pal, Rakesh Kumar Yadav, Prabhakar Dwivedi, Gulab Chand Bharati, Chandra Prakash Pal, Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari, Anand Prakash Mishra, Siddharth Khare, V.D. Sharma, Manoj Kumar Singh, Ram Prasad Dubey, Triloki Singh, Seemant Singh, Suhel Ahmad Azmi, Mohd. Afzal Ansari, Pranab Kumar Ganguli, Deshraj Singh, Ramesh Pundir, Rekha Pundir, Harendra Prakash Dwivedi, Mahavir Verma, Radhey Shyam Maurya, Ravi Prakash Pandey, Santosh Kumar Chaubey, Ajai Kumar Singh Kushwaha, Ashish Kumar Gupta, Haidar Ali, Kaushlesh Tripathi, Shashwat Shukla, Shekhar Chaudhary, Vishal Kashyap, Vidyapati Tripathi, Juned Alam, Sunil Kumar Srivastava, Shiv Poojan Yadav, Mool Chandra Mishra, Vishesh Kumar, Shobhit Dubey, Shashi Nandan, Chandra Prakash Pal and Om Prakash Vishwakarma for the Petitioners; C.S.C., Abhishek Srivastava, Anadi Krishna Narayan, Ayank Mishra, Baleshwar Chaturvedi, Ghazala Bano Quadari, H.R. Mishra, J.P. Pandey, Pankaj Shukla, Syed Faizan Ahamad, Pratik Chandra, Abhinav Ojha, Pradeep Chandra, Mahboob Ahmad, Rahul Pandey, Kapil Dev Singh Rathore and Shiv Kumar Singh for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Yashwant Varma, J.—Heard Shri Ashok Khare, Shri Shashi Nandan, learned Senior Counsels and Shri Seemant Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri H.R. Mishra, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri J.P. Pandey who appeared for the Electricity Service Commission (“the Commission”) and Sri Ramendra Pratap Singh, who has appeared for the U.P. Power Corporation Ltd (“the Corporation”).

A. PROLOGUE

2. This batch of writ petitions assails a selection undertaken by the Commission for appointment to the post of Technician Grade II (Training Electrical). The two advertisements which form subject-matter of the issues raised herein are dated 6 September 2014 and 24 April 2015. These advertisements invited applications for appointment against 2211 and 884 posts respectively of Technician Grade II.

3. With the consent of parties Writ-A No. 41750 of 2015 and Writ A No. 64805 of 2015 were treated as the lead writ petitions. The first writ petition seeks quashing of the select list dated 14 July 2015 and further seeks the revision of the select list after excluding ther

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2017 Supreme(All) 2115

YASHWANT VARMAPRASHANT KUMAR JAISWAL – AppellantVersusSTATE OF U. P. – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

YASHWANT VARMA
PRASHANT KUMAR JAISWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent