SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(All) 55

KRISHNA MURARI, AJAY BHANOT
SURENDRA NATH SINGH YADAV – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Shesh Nath Singh Yadav for the Petitioner; C.S.C., A.S.G.I. and Pranjal Mehrotra for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a writ of mandamus to command the Land Acquisition Officer/Additional District Magistrate, District Ghazipur-respondent No. 4 to consider and decide his claim of compensation for acquisition of land comprising of gata Nos. 646ka, 646ka and 646ga situate in village Mahmoodpur Pali, Pargana-Saidpur, District Ghazipur. Another relief claimed is mandamus to command the said respondent to decide his representation dated 31.5.2017 which is numbered as 2313 of 2017 pending before him.

2. Admittedly, the said land is a subject-matter of acquisition under the provisions of National Highways Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as “Act”). Notification under Section 3-A of the Act was issued on 1.12.2014 and that under Section 3-D(2) of the Act was published on 24.9.2015. The petitioner purchased the said land from the erstwhile owner by means of registered sale-deed dated 22.7.2016.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the basis of the sale-deed executed by the erstwhile owner he is entitled to be paid compensation for the said land.

4. It is well-settled proposition of law by judicial pronouncement of the Apex









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top