SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 2223

SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI
SOHAN YADAV – Appellant
Versus
GRAM SABHA MAHRAJ GANJ – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Ashok Kumar Shukla for the Petitioners; C.S.C. and Tariq Maqbool Khan for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani, J.—Heard Sri Ashok Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri I.S. Tomar, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondent No. 2 and Sri Tariq Maqbool Khan, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1, Gram Sabha.

2. With the consent of learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, this writ petition is being finally heard without calling for a counter-affidavit.

Facts

3. Briefly stated facts of the present case are that the petitioners filed O.S. No. 91 of 2016 (Sohan Yadav and others v. Gram Sabha, Mahrajganj and another) seeking declaration and permanent injunction with respect to certain Khasra plots of Village - Mahrajganj, Tappa - Marachchi Chandaur, Pargana - Haveli, Tehsil - Sadar, District Gorakhpur. Fixed Court Fees was paid by them in terms of the provisions of Article 17(iii) of Schedule II and Section 7(iv-B)(b) of the Court Fees Act, 1870 being Rs. 200 + Rs.500, total Rs.700. The Munsirim submitted a report for deficiency of Court Fees. Petitioners objected to

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top