SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 2140

J.J.MUNIR
HAKIM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
R.K. Srivastava and Pankaj Dwivedi for the Revisionist; A.G.A. for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J.

1. This criminal revision is directed against the judgment and order of Shri Yashpal Lukadia, the then 11th Additional Sessions Judge, Agra dated 07.06.1996 in Criminal Appeal No. 65 of 1995 dismissing the appeal of the revisionist Hakim Singh preferred from a judgment and order of Sri S.C. Garg, the then IXth Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra dated 22.07.1995 convicting the revisionist under Section 332 IPC and sentencing him to suffer six months rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 200/- and further convicting him for an offence punishable under Section 147 IPC, wherefor a sentence of 6 months rigorous imprisonment has been awarded, in addition to which fine of Rs. 200/- has been imposed. Both sentences have been ordered to run concurrently.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 14.06.1986 at about 6:00 in the evening hours the complainant Gautam Singh, a forest guard along with his companion Bharat Singh Pal, another forest guard were on their beat in the Kunwer Khera Forest Block when they discovered stumps of trees that had been recently cut away. Both the forest guards reached fields located between Mungawali Forest Block and
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top