PANKAJ MITHAL, IRSHAD ALI
RAMJEET SINGH YADAV – Appellant
Versus
BAR COUNCIL OF U. P. – Respondent
By the Court.—Under challenge in this petition is the order dated 30.7.2017 passed by the then Chairman, Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad (hereinafter referred to as the Bar Council). The petitioner has also made a prayer for declaring the minutes of the meeting of the Bar Council dated 29.7.2017 and the e-mail communication dated 3.8.2017 thereof as null and void. A further prayer has been made for quashing of the charge-sheet served upon him (Annexure 4 to the petition) and to allow him to continue to function as the Secretary of the Bar Council.
2. We have heard Sri Shashi Nandan, Senior Counsel and Sri Anoop Trivedi on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Amit Kumar and Sri Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel for the Bar Council and the Special Committee headed by the Advocate General respectively.
3. The respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are parties by name. We have not considered it appropriate to call upon them to participate in the proceedings in the personal capacity as the matter can be decided even without their assistance specially when no relief has been claimed against them.
4. Learned counsel for the contesting parties have agreed for final disposal of the writ petition at
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.