SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 2374

SUDHIR AGARWAL, AJIT KUMAR
ECI-SPIC-SMO-MCML (JV) – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL ORGANIZATION FOR RAILWAY ELECTRIFICATION, ALLAHABAD – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Rohan Gupta and Anurag Khanna for the Petitioner; Rajnish Kumar Rai for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—Heard Sri Anurag Khanna, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Rohan Gupta, Advocate for petitioner and perused the record.

2. This writ petition by M/s ECI-SPIC-SMO-MCML(JV), a Joint Venture Company formed for the purpose of Design, Supply, Erection, Testing and Commissioning of 25 KV, AC, 50 Hz, Single Phase, Electrification Works, having its registered office at Hyderabad, has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India being aggrieved by termination of work contract vide letter dated 1.11.2017 issued by Chief Project Director, Railway Electrification, New Jalpaiguri.

3. Facts in brief giving rise to present writ petition are as under.

4. Central Organization for Railway Electrification is set up by Ministry of Railways and functions through its General Manager. It floated a tender for electrification on 25 KV AC Single phase 50 Hz electrification of Katihar (Incl)-Barsoi (Via Director Kumedpur)-Raninagar Jalpaiguri (Incl) (267 RKM/607 TKM) Section (Gr 150) of Katihar Division, of N.F. Railway, under RE Project New Jailpaiguri on turnkey b



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top