AMAR SINGH CHAUHAN
LALIT KARGETI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon'ble Amar Singh Chauhan,J.
Shri Hemendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and Shri V.K. Sharma, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 are present.
2. Heard and perused the material on record.
3. The applicant Lalit Kargeti, through this application moved under Section 482 Cr.P.C., has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court with a prayer to quash the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 3949/05 (Kishan Chandra and another Vs. Lalit Kargeti), under Section 406, 420 I.P.C., P.S. Ramgarh, District Firozabad, pending in the court of A.C.J.M.-I, Firozabad.
4. The brief facts which are requisite for the adjudication of the application are that on 27.8.2004, opposite party no. 2 has placed an order for purchase of Automatic Hydrolic Rim Straightening Machine and one Pneumatic Electrical Tyre Changer and in view of the aforesaid demand, machines were transported to the workshop of the opposite party. The opposite party raised an allegation in the complaint that the said machine has not been functioning properly and not transported in view of the quotation dated 20.8.2004 along with Demand Draft No. 670719
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.