Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.

1. Heard Sri S.K. Varma, learned senior advocate assisted by Sri Bipin Lal Khurana, learned counsel for defendants-petitioners/landlords. No one appears on behalf of the plaintiffs-respondents/tenants.

2. In view of the office report dated 02.01.2018, service of notice upon the defendants-respondents No.1 and 2 is deemed sufficient.

Facts:-

3. Briefly stated facts of the present case are that undisputedly the plaintiff-respondent No.1 is a tenant occupying a shop in the house owned by the petitioners-landlords, at a monthly rent of Rs.1000/- since last more than 25 years. The plaintiff-respondent No.1/tenant was being given amenity in the form of electricity supply by the defendants-petitioners. However, the electricity supply was obstructed and stopped by the defendants-petitioners to the plaintiff-respondent/tenant in September, 2014. Under the circumstances, the plaintiff-respondent No.1/tenant applied for an electricity connection vide Receipt No.1001864282 dated 20.12.2014. An Electricity Connection No.3009/207883 was allotted to him by the respondent No.2 i.e. the Electricity Department. Subsequently, the respondent No.2 informed