SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(All) 576

ANIL KUMAR, SANJAY HARKAULI
AMAR PAL MAURYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Anuj Dayal for the Appellant; A.G.A. for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Anil Kumar, J.—Heard Sri Anuj Dayal, learned counsel for appellant-accused, Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla, learned AGA and perused the record.

2. Under challenge in the instant appeal is the judgment and order dated 3.11.2015 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 4, Sitapur in Sessions Trial No. 928 of 2011 (State v. Amarpal Maurya) arising out of Crime Case No. 103 of 2011 under Section 302, 504 I.P.C. Police Station, Pisawan, District Sitapur whereby the appellant/Amar Pal Maurya was convicted for the offence under Section 302 I.P.C., sentenced with the imprisonment of life and also fine of Rs. 2000/- with the default stipulation of one year additional rigorous imprisonment.

3. In brief, case of the prosecution was that the complainant, Naresh S/o Puttu R/o Village - Dhakhaura Thana Piswan District Sitapur lodged a First Information Report at Thana - Pisawan District Sitapur on 20.3.2011 that his brother Raju who is a labour in Delhi had come to celebrate Holi festival at his house. Four months prior to the incident, Raju had given Rs. 1500/- as a loan to Am






































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top