SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(All) 644

SIDDHARTH
PREM NARAIN – Appellant
Versus
MAHABIR JAIN – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
S.D. Pathak, Dinesh Pathak and Rakesh Pathak for the Appellant; B.N. Agarwal, Ayub Khan and Vinod Kumar for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Siddharth, J.—Heard Sri Dinesh Pathak, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Vinod Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent.

This is plaintiff’s Second Appeal against the Judgment and Decree dated 26.10.1989, passed by Ist Additional District Judge, Jhansi in Civil Appeal No. 106 of 1986 and the dismissing the Appeal and confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 16.5.1986 passed by Civil Judge, Jhansi in Original Suit No. 35 of 1985 (Prem Narain v. Mahavir Jain Uchchattar Madhyamik Vidhyalaya Ranipur, Jhansi).

2. The plaintiff-appellant instituted an Original Suit No. 35 of 1985 before the learned Trial Court, praying for cancellation the sale-deed dated 25.11.1974. Plaintiff’s case is that he and defendant Nos. 2, 3 and 4 belong to the same family, Shajra whereof is attached with the plaint; that the plaintiff and defendant Nos. 2, 3 and 4 lived jointly till 1960; that the moveable and immoveable properties were divided between the parties in 1960 and they are accordingly in possession; that the plaintiff was entitled to half share and defendant Nos. 2 to 4















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top