SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(All) 721

SUNITA AGARWAL
RUPAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Jitendra Pal Singh Chauhan for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.

2. The present writ petition is directed against the order dated 19.6.2017 passed by the Chief Medical Officer, Bijnor rejecting the claim of the petitioner for grant of compassionate appointment on the ground that she was not the dependent of the deceased employee who had died on 7.6.2006.

3. The order impugned categorically records that after the death of the deceased employee, his son had claimed for compassionate appointment. The said application was scrutinized by the competent authority and the family members of the deceased employee were certified vide letter dated 30.9.2006. All other family members gave 'No Objection Certificate' in favour of the applicant (son of the deceased employee). Vide letter dated 7.7.2011, the applicant (son of the deceased employee) was informed that he could not be appointed on the post of Junior Clerk/Health Worker (Male) on compassionate ground rather an offer was given for his engagement against a Class IV post. No reply was received pursuant to the said letter and as such no appointment under Dying-in-Harness Rules, 1974 was given

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top