SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(All) 725

RAHUL CHATURVEDI
RAMAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
K.K. Dwivedi for the Applicant; A.G.A. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi J.

Heard Sri K.K. Dwivedi, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records of the case.

2. After hearing the counsels at length, I propose to decide the matter at the admission stage.

3. By means of present Criminal Misc. Application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. the applicant Raman has challenged the order dated 22.5.2015 passed by Special C.J.M. Agra in Case No. 12407/2014 (State Vs. Ravi Kant Yadav and others) U/s 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C. Police Station Tajganj District Agra and also judgment dated 23.9.2017 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge Court No. 18, Agra in Criminal Revision No. 140/2015 (Raman Vs. State of U.P. and another). Thus from the above, it is clear that only two orders are under challenge by the applicant i.e. order dated 22.5.2015 by which the Special C.J.M. has issued non-bailable-warrants requiring his attendance before the court and when the said order was challenged by means of Criminal Revision No.140/2015, the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Court No. 18, Agra vide order dated 23.9.2017 dismissed the revision confirming the order dated 22.5.2015.

4. In order to appreciate the entire controversy,























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top