RAHUL CHATURVEDI
RAMAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi J.
Heard Sri K.K. Dwivedi, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records of the case.
2. After hearing the counsels at length, I propose to decide the matter at the admission stage.
3. By means of present Criminal Misc. Application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. the applicant Raman has challenged the order dated 22.5.2015 passed by Special C.J.M. Agra in Case No. 12407/2014 (State Vs. Ravi Kant Yadav and others) U/s 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C. Police Station Tajganj District Agra and also judgment dated 23.9.2017 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge Court No. 18, Agra in Criminal Revision No. 140/2015 (Raman Vs. State of U.P. and another). Thus from the above, it is clear that only two orders are under challenge by the applicant i.e. order dated 22.5.2015 by which the Special C.J.M. has issued non-bailable-warrants requiring his attendance before the court and when the said order was challenged by means of Criminal Revision No.140/2015, the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Court No. 18, Agra vide order dated 23.9.2017 dismissed the revision confirming the order dated 22.5.2015.
4. In order to appreciate the entire controversy,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.