SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(All) 947

AJAY BHANOT
TRIBHUWAN PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Arvind Kumar Singh for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Ajay Bhanot, J.—The petitioner was the fair price shop dealer of village panchayat Baldeeh, District-Azamgarh. The fair price shop licence of the petitioner was cancelled by order dated 19.7.2017. The petitioner carried the order of termination in appeal. The appeal was registered as Appeal No.326 of 2017, Tribhuwan Prasad v. District Supply Officer before the Court of learned Commissioner Azamgarh Division, Azamgarh. The appeal was instituted on 25.9.2017.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the delay in the disposal of the appeal. Even though the appeal was instituted on 25.9.2017, the appeal is still on foot, and has not been decided finally. The relief prayed for in this writ petition is for a direction to the authorities to decide the appeal in a stipulated period of time to be fixed by this Court.

3. The order-sheet reveals that the appeal was posted for admission herein before the learned appellate Court for the first time on 25.10.2017. On the first date of hearing notices were issued to the parties and records were summoned. The second date of hearing as per the order-sheet was 30.11.2017. No effective hearing took place on 30.11.2017. The next date for heari















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top