Hon’ble Attau Rahman Masoodi, J.—Vakalatnama filed by Shri Dhurv Kumar learned counsel on behalf of opposite party No. 1 is taken on record.

Heard Sri Anil Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Dhruv Kumar learned counsel who has put in appearance on behalf of opposite party No. 1.

Opposite party No. 4 is the son of the claimant(opposite party No. 1) whereas opposite party No. 5 is the married daughter of the claimant(opposite party No. 1).

2. This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has assailed the order passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat on 7.3.2018 in P.L.A. Case No. 208 of 2015 whereby the application Ka-8 filed by the petitioner under Section 22C(4) & (5) of the Legal Services Authorities Act for settlement of the claim through conciliation has been rejected on the ground that the insurer in the previous settlements made through conciliation has complied with the award by making payment of cheques to the beneficiaries through the District Magistrate rather depositing the same before the PLA.

3. Sri Anil Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner drawing attention of this Court to clause 16 of the agreement has argued that