SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(All) 1026

SIDDHARTHA VARMA
RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Saral Srivastava and Anil Kumar Bajpai for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Siddhartha Varma, J.—The instant writ petition has been filed against the judgment and order dated 8.1.2007 passed by the Additional District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue) Jalaun, Orai and the judgment and order dated 3.4.2008 passed by the Commissioner, Jhansi Division, Jhansi which he passed in his Revisional jurisdiction.

2. The facts of the case are that a lease deed was executed in favour of the petitioner on 18.2.2005. On a report dated 5.8.2006, of the Assistant Inspector General of Registration, Jalaun, a case was registered and the petitioner was put to notice. The petitioner replied and thereafter when its reply was not found satisfactory, by order dated 8.1.2007 a deficiency of stamp duty to the tune of Rs. 3,35,200/- was found by Additional District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue) Jalaun, Orai. The petitioner filed a revision which was also dismissed on 3.4.2008 by the Commissioner, Jhansi Division, Jhansi. Aggrieved thereof the instant writ petition has been filed.

3. The contention of Sri Anil Kumar Bajpai, learned counsel for the petitioner, is that the very premise on the basis of which the stamp duty has been imposed was wrong. The authorities h











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top