RAMESH SINHA, DINESH KUMAR SINGH I
ROHITASHAV KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
By the Court.—Heard Sri B.B. Jauhari, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri N.K. Verma, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
2. The present 482 Cr.P.C application has been filed with the prayer to quash the order dated 8.2.2018 passed in Misc. case No. 10 of 2017 (Rohitashav Kumar v. Shishu Pal Singh and others) under Sections 467, 468, 471, 120B I.P.C. read with Section 7/13 Prevention of Corruption Act, decided by Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) Court No. 2/ Additional Sessions Judge Bareilly (Annexure 2) and the further prayer is made to stay the operation and effect of the said order dated 8.2.2018 (Annexure 2) and that a direction be issued to the said Court to pass fresh orders on the application of the applicant.
3. It would be proper to refer here to the complaint made as well as the impugned order passed thereon so as to know what were the facts of the case and what order was passed by the Court below. In the complaint, it is mentioned that the petitioner has submitted an application before the Court below under Section 156(3) Cr. P. C. stating that he was appointed on the post of clerk in District Panchayat Uchchtar Madhyamik Vidyalay
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.