SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(All) 1041

BHARATI SAPRU, DINESH KUMAR SINGH
SURESH KUMAR SHEETLANI – Appellant
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER-1 (3), AGRA – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Swapnil Kumar and Praveen Kumar for the Appellant; C.S.C., Income Tax and Manish Goyal for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.—This appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act’) has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 17th June, 2011 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Agra Bench, Agra (hereinafter referred to as the “Tribunal”) in ITA No. 467/Agra/2009, Assessment Year (hereinafter referred to as “A.Y.”) 1999-2000.

2. While admitting the appeal on 25th November, 2011, the following two questions of law were formulated :

“(A) Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has erred in law and on the facts of the case in holding that the service of notice dated 28.3.2006 issued under Section 148 of the Act, on the last known address, which the department had collected from the bank, whereas the last known address was available in the return filed by the petitioner, can be treated to be valid service?

(B) Whether the proceedings in pursuance to the notice under Section 148 can be initiated without affecting service, which in accordance with Section 282 of the Income Tax Act, even if it is presumed






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top