SUDHIR AGARWAL, OM PRAKASH VII
ANJALI PAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
By the Court.—Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned Standing counsel for respondents and perused the record.
2. This intra-Court appeal under Chapter VIII Rule 5 of Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as “Rules, 1952”) has arisen from judgment and order dated 7.8.2018 passed by learned Single Judge dismissing appellant’s writ petition No. 16915 of 2018 challenging order of transfer dated 31.5.2018.
3. It is not in dispute that order of transfer has been passed by Competent Authority. Appellant is working on a transferable post and is liable to be transferred and transfer is not contrary to any statutory rules. However, complaint is that transfer is in violation of transfer policy.
4. The employer once possess right to transfer an employee from one place to another, in our view, there is no legal or otherwise corresponding obligation upon him to inform his employee why and in what circumstance an employee is being transferred from one place to another. Shifting and transferring of employee from one place to another involves more than thousand reasons and it is difficult to identify all of them in black and white. The commonest reason may be a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.