SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 2459

SUDHIR AGARWAL, K.J.THAKER
MALTI DEVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Phool Bux Singh for the Appellant; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT :

1. This intra court Appeal under Chapter VIII Rule 5 of Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as "Rules 1952") has come up assailing the judgment dated 24.2.2014 passed by learned Single Judge dismissing appellant's writ petition No. 1156(S/S) of 2014.

2. The aforesaid writ petition was filed by appellant challenging order dated 20.12.2013 passed by Superintendent of Police, Kheri, rejecting claim of appellant for extra ordinary pension under provisions of U.P. Police (Staff) Extra Ordinary Pension Rules, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as " Rules 1961) as amended from time to time. She has sought a mandamus to the respondents to allow extra ordinary pension to appellant under the aforesaid rules.

3. The facts giving rise to present dispute are that Radhey Lal, husband of appellant, a Constable in U.P. Police Force, was posted at Kheri. He was assigned duty of submitting some record in Forensic Lab, Lucknow in connection with case crime No. 100 of 1995 and 101 of 1995 under Section 8/18 of NDPS Act on 12.12.1995. While on duty he suffered heart attack on 12.12.1995 and ultimately died on 15.2.1996.

4. Thereafter appellant submitted application dated 30.
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top