SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 2485

RAM SURAT RAM (MAURYA)
Hansraja Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Harshita Rani and Shekhar Kumar Yadav, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

Ram Surat Ram Maurya, J.

Heard, Sri Shekhar Kumar Yadav, for the petitioner and Standing Counsel, for State of U.P.

2. The writ petition has been filed for quashing the orders of Sub-Divisional Officer dated 01.03.2007, terminating Lal Pratap Singh (husband of the petitioner) from service of Collection Amin and the Collector dated 23.08.2017 dismissing the appeal of the petitioner against aforesaid order and for mandamus directing the respondents to pay arrears of salary till death, retiral and other consequential benefits to the petitioner.

3. Lal Pratap Singh (husband of the petitioner) was appointed on the post of Collection Amin by way of stop-gap arrangement on temporary basis on 31.10.1986, in tahsil Karchhana, district Allahabad. One Ram Prasad Dwivedi son of Ram Kishor Dwivedi, resident of village Chak Shobharam, tahsil Karchhana, district Allahabad made a complaint against Lal Pratap Singh that he had deposited Rs. 623.35/- with Lal Pratap Singh towards irrigation dues, who had issued receipt No. 08362 dated 10.09.1989 to him. However in treasury only Rs. 23.35/- was deposited. On this complaint, a preliminary inquiry was conducted by Naib Tahsildar, who found that














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top