SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(All) 2538

ANIL KUMAR
Sheelu Devi – Appellant
Versus
Uttara Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ravi Singh
For the Respondent: A.Z Siddiqui

JUDGMENT :

Anil Kumar, J.

Heard Sri Ravi Singh, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri A.Z. Siddiqui, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 as well as Sri Anil Kr. Chaubey, learned State counsel on behalf of respondent Nos. 7 & 8 and perused the record.

2. Notice to respondent Nos. 2 to 5 & 9 are dispensed with.

3. Facts in brief of the present case are that an election for electing Gram Pradhan of Village Panchayat Majhiya Block Hariyawa Tehsil & district Hardoi has held in which the petitioner has been declared successful.

4. Aggrieved by the said facts, respondent No. 1/Smt. Uttaradevi has filed an election petition in which respondent Nos. 2 to 6 who are the other candidates in the election are impleaded as formal parties, before respondent No. 7/Sub-Divisional Magistrate/Election Authority, Hardoi under Section 12(c) of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on 22.12.2015 in which she has moved an application for amendment under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC on 11.08.2016 to which petitioner filed her objection on 19.08.2016, rejected by order dated 19.08.2016. Thereafter, again respondent No. 1/Smt. Uttaradevi moved a second application for amendment on 19.05.2017










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top