Surya Prakash Kesarwani, J.

Heard Sri Pankaj Agarwal, learned counsel for the defendants-tenants/petitioners.

2. This petition has been filed praying for the following relief:

"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to call for the records of the court below and set aside the impugned order dated 23.1.2018 passed by learned Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act)/Additional District Judge, Ghaziabad in Rent Control Appeal No. 40 of 2012 (Annexure-7 to the instant petition) rejecting amendment application Paper No. 71Ga and allow the same; or such other and further order be passed as is expedient in the interest of justice."

3. Undisputedly, the plaintiff-respondent is the owner and landlord of the disputed shop. Following due process of law, he filed an application under Section 21(i)(a) of U.P. Act XIII of 1972 being P.A. Case No. 01 of 2007 (Sri Chetan Prakash Verma v. Vinod Kumar and another) for release of the disputed shop for start of business by his grand-son Amit Kumar Verma, who is said to be an educated unemployed youth and has completed the hardware networking course. It is also stated in the release application that since the afore