ANIL KUMAR, ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA II
Subhash son of Jagannath Bhurji – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
Anil Kumar, J.
1. Heard Shri Anurag Shukla Amicus Curiae for the accused-appellant and Ms. Farhat Jamal Siddiqui, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. Instant appeal has arisen against the judgment and order dated 19.3.2008, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Hardoi in S.T. No.432/2006, arising out of Crime No.122/2006, under section 302 IPC, Police Station Behata Gokul, District Hardoi and connected S.T. No.501/2006, arising out of case crime no.124/2006, under section 25 Arms Act, Police Station Behata Gokul, District Hardoi, whereby the learned trial court had convicted the accused Subhash under section 302 IPC and sentenced him imprisonment for life and pay a fine of Rs.5000/-. In default of payment of fine he has to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. However, learned trial court had acquitted the accused for an offence punishable under section 25 Arms Act.
3. A first information report was lodged at police station Behata Gokul on 05.4.2006 by Mukesh Stating that he is the resident of Village Bilsari, Police Station Pachdevara, District Hardoi, but at the time of incident he alongwith his brothers was residing at Raushar Koth
Bipin Kumar Mondal vs. State of West Bengal
Kilakkatha Parambath Sasi vs. State of Kerala
Laxman vs. State of Maharashtra
Mafabhai Nagarbhai Raval vs. State of Gujarat
Meharaj Singh v. State of U.P.
Mohar Singh vs. State of Punjab
Mukesh vs. State(NCT of Delhi)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.