SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(All) 379

H. N. SETH, SATISH CHANDRA
Commissioner of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Shanker Lal Ram Nath – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Deokinandan, For the Appellant / A. Dhawan and J.M. Pant, For the Respondent

JUDGMENT

H.N. Seth, J. - At the instance of the Commissioner of Income Tax, Lucknow, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench, has referred the following questions for the opinion of this court:

"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in holding that the firm as reconstituted within the meaning of Section 187(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was entitled to choose its own accounting period, as a new assessee, from the date of its reconstitution, in its own right ?

2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally correct in directing exclusion from the assessment under consideration of the income relating to the period ending March 31, 1961, for making another assessment in respect of profits of the old firm on the basis of the previous year of that firm ?"

2. The assessee in this case is a partnership firm carrying on business under the name and style of Messrs. Shiv Shanker Lal Ram Nath. The two questions mentioned above arise in connection with its assessment for the year 1962-63. Earlier, seven persons carried on the partnership business under the name and style of Messrs, Shiv Shanker Lal R

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top