SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(All) 304

BHARGAVA
COMMISSIONER OF Income Tax, U. P. and – Appellant
Versus
P. V. KALICHARAN JAGANNATH. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

BHARGAVA, J. - The question referred for our opinion is :

"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the sum of Rs. 72,637 is liable to be assessed in the assessment year 1946-47 ?"

On some date falling within the previous year 1st April, 1945, to 31st March, 1946, the assessee entered into a contract to supply fruits and bullock carts for transport purposes to the military department. The supply had to be made at Chheoki and at Kanpur. The Kanpur trading account showed a loss of Rs. 13,164 on supplies of Rs. 1,84,583. Thereafter, under the terms of the agreement, the assessee submitted a petition to the military department for a review, whereupon the military authorities, on the 6th of November, 1947, sanctioned the payment of an additional sum of Rs. 72,637. This sum was actually paid to the assessee on the 17th of February, 1948 and the 24th of February, 1948. The question arose whether this sum of Rs. 72,637 could be included in the assessment of the income of the assessee for the previous year relevant to the assessment year 1946-47. The Income Tax Officer, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Tribunal concurrently held that this sum of money must

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top