SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(All) 269

MALIK, MOOTHAM
SADI RAM GANGA PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF Income Tax, U. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

MALIK, CJ., and MOOTHAM, J. - In the year 1947 a reference was made to this Court u/s 66(I) of the Indian Income Tax Act and the question referred to us was as follows :-

"Whether in the circumstances of this case the loss of Rs. 10,000 arising out of the loss of title and possession of the house under the High Court decree dated 26th October, 1943, during the accounting year was a revenue loss admissible under the provisions of section 10(2)(xi) or a capital loss."

The reference came up before a Bench of this Court on the 17th of December, 1951, and, in view of the provisions of section 10(2)(xi), the Bench asked for a further statement of the case. On the 13th of October, 1952, the Tribunal sent up a further statement of the case and it has now re-framed the question as follows :-

"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of this case the loss of Rs. 10,000 arising out of the loss of title and possession of the house property under the High Court decree dated 26th October, 1943, was a business loss, which the assessee was entitled to set off against his business profits for the assessment year 1944-45."

The assessee carried on business "in speculation and ran a flour mil

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top