SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1916 Supreme(All) 292

SUNDER LAL, WALSH
Puttu Mal – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Indu – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. This suit relates to certain land in Kamalganj. The plaintiffs are the zemindars of the village. Nanhe and Balli bhatiaras or inn-keepers are residents of the village, who are occupants or owners of certain shops or buildings in the sarai. The dispute does not relate to the shops or buildings but to plots of open land and land covered by a chabutara, which have been recently sold and which the other defendants now intend to build upon. The plaintiffs' case is that they are the zemindars of the village, that as such they are the owners of the land, that the defendants do not own the land in dispute, that they have no right to sell and that the transferees have no right to build upon the land without the plaintiffs' consent. The Court of first instance dismissed the suit. The learned Judge in appeal has decreed it. The question is whether the findings at which that Court has arrived can be disturbed by us.

2. There was previously a suit about lands in this very village which is reported as Incha Ram v. Bande Ali Khan 11 Ind. Cas. 52 : 8 A. L. J. 877 : 33 A. 757. That case did not decide that Kamalganj was an agricultural village. But at one time or other there can be no dou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top