H. N. SETH, R. L. GULATI
J. P. Srivastava and Sons (Kanpur) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Gulati, J. - This is a reference u/s 66(1) of the Indian income tax Act, 1922.
2. The assessee is a private limited company. In the previous year relevant to the assessment year 1960-61, the assessee had earned a sum of rupees one lakh which in its opinion was exempt from Income Tax. Thus, in the return filed for the assessment year 1960-61, the assessee did not include in its taxable income the sum of rupees one lakh and appended the following note in Part D of the return which is meant for showing items of income and gain in respect of which the assessee claims exemption.
"Addition to capital reserve......Rs. 1,00,000.
(i) It is a receipt of casual nature not arising from any business, profession, vocation or occupation ; and
(ii) It is also not taxable as capital gain on account of aggregate capital loss of Rs. 21,09,001 brought forward u/s 24(2B) from 1954-55 and 1956-57."
3. The Income Tax Officer passed an assessment order on March 7, 1964, but did not deal with the claim of the assessee contained in Part D of the return. Later on he issued a notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as in his opinion the sum of Rs. 1,00,000 mentioned by the assessee in Part D had escape
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.