JUDGMENT

Piggott and Sulaiman, JJ. - This appeal represents a further stage in certain execution proceedings which have been once already before this Court, vide the case of Muhammad Hafiz v. Muhammad Ibrahim ILR (1920) All. 152. The appellant now before us, Sheikh Badr-ud-din Khan Bahadur, is one of the two sureties who bound themselves for the satisfaction of a certain decree. One of the points taken in appeal before us is as to the interpretation of the security bond and the nature of the obligations thereby undertaken by the sureties. We do not say, for a moment, that Sheikh Badr-ud-din Khan Bahadur, who was not a party to the appeal before the Court in the reported case referred to, is not entitled to be heard on this point; but, having heard him, we are still of opinion, that the terms of the security bond were rightly interpreted by this Court when delivering the aforesaid judgment. The result is that one of the obligations, jointly and severally as sumed by the two sureties, was the satisfaction of the entire decree, in the event of the judgment-debtor, Muhammad Ibrahim, failing to satisfy it. The only further question that can be raised is one of limitation. It has been poi