SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(All) 352

H. N. SETH, R. S. PATHAK
Commissioner of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
M. L. Gupta and Sons – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
B.L. Gupta and R.R. Misra, For the Appellant / P.N. Pachauri, For the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Pathak, J. - The following question has been referred to this court by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal:

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in cancelling the penalty of Rs. 8,732 imposed on the assessee ?"

2. The assessee is a registered firm. The relevant assessment year is 1958-59. On April 23, 1962, the assessee filed a voluntary return of its income of the previous year. The Income Tax Officer observed that the return should have been filed by July, 1958, as provided in Section 22(1) of the Indian Income Tax Act of 1922. The Income Tax Officer made an order levying a penalty u/s 271(1)(a) of the Act of 1961. The assessee appealed to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner but without success. He then appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal held that the provisions of Section 271(1)(a) could not be invoked in the case because the new Act did not specifically declare that a default in complying with Section 22(1) of the Act of 1922 would be deemed to be a default in complying with Section 139 of the Act of 1961. At the instance of the Commissioner of Income Tax, the Tribunal has referred the question set out

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top