SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(All) 333

H. N. SETH, R. L. GULATI
Madho Mahesh Sugar Mills (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
V.P. Misra, For the Appellant / Deokinandan Agarwal, For the Respondent

JUDGMENT

R.L. Gulati, J. - u/s 256(1) of the income tax Act, 1961, the income tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad, has submitted a statement of the case inviting the opinion of this court on the following question of law:

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and on a true construction of the Government notification dated April 27, 1961, it could be held that no liability accrued to the assessee-company for the payment of the gratuity for the assessment year under appeal?"

The assessment year involved is 1962-63, the relevant accounting period being the year ending on September 30, 1961. The assessee claimed to deduct a sum of Rs. 1,37,811 in the computation of its net income liable to income tax. This amount, according to the assessee represented the sum which he would be required to pay to its workmen on account of gratuity. The claim was disallowed by the income tax Officer, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of income tax and finally by the income tax Appellate Tribunal. The main ground for disallowing the claim, as set out in the order of the Tribunal, is that in the relevant accounting year no ascertained liability arose for payment of gratuity. When the r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top