SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1912 Supreme(All) 392

CHAMIER, KARAMAT HUSAIN
Musammat Raja Dei – Appellant
Versus
Umed Singh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Chamier, J. - Nagina Singh died many years ago leavinga window Musammat Waziri, a daughter Musammat Raja Dei and a daughter's son Kan Singh. In June 1909 Musammat Waziri, who was in possession of the estate of her husband, made a gift of it to Kan Singh. The plaintiffs at once brought this suit for a declaration that the gift was not binding upon them. The plaintiffs, other than the present respondentUmed Singh, are more distantly related to Nagina Singh than Umed Singh is. The Courts below have agreed in making a declaration as prayed in favour of Umed Singh. Kan Singh died while the suit was pending in the Court of first instance. The appeal to the lower Appellate Court was filed, by Musammat Raja Dei and it is she who has filed the second appeal. In this Court it is contended that at the date of the institution of the suit Umed Singh was not the nearest reversionary heir of Nagina Singh and, therefore, the suit was not maintainable. Indeed, it is contended that even Kan Singh, supposing he had not been the donee of the property, could not have maintained s suit for a declaration inasmuch as the next reversioner was his mother Raja Dei.

2. There is, of course, no doubt tha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top