SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1920 Supreme(All) 249

PIGGOTT, WALSH
Firm Nainsukh Das Nagar Mal – Appellant
Versus
Firm Gajanand-Shyam Lal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. This is an appeal from an order by the District; Judge of Cawnpore, dated the 21st of February 1920, refusing; to file an award. The application on which the order was made was presented by one of the arbitrators at the request of the successful party in the arbitration, namely, the present appellant. An objection was made to the application by the present respondents on the ground that there had been no valid submission,

2. A preliminary objection was raised at the hearing of the appeal on the ground that no appeal lies. On the face of the order, it is clearly one within the expressed provision of Section 104(1)(f) of the Civil Procedure Code, being "an order refusing to file an award in an arbitration without the intervention of the Court." The District Judge decided that this section does not apply to the arbitration award, as this award purports to have been under the Arbitration Act (IX of 1899). There is nothing in that Act to support this view, and it is to be noted that the Civil-Procedure Code was re-enacted some years later than the Arbitration Act. In support of the preliminary objection an authority has been sited, Campbell & Co. v. Jeshrai Giridhari Lall 46 I

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top