SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1933 Supreme(All) 150

MUKERJI
Ram Singh – Appellant
Versus
Deo Narain – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Mukerji, J. - This is a pre-emption appeal and the pre-emptor, who is the appellant before us, is a minor; The pedigree given in the written statement of the vendee, defendant 1, is accepted by the learned Counsel for the appellant. It shows that the elder brother of the appellant, Ram Singh, and the own paternal uncles of Ram Singh, namely, Jang Bahadur Singh, Jagdeo Singh and Udant Singh together with Bisheshar Singh, a distantly related collateral, sold the property in suit to the respondent, Deo Narain. Ram Singh claims pre-emption and his suit failed, because it was held that as a member of the joint Hindu family he had no right to maintain the suit.

2. In this Court it has been contended that Ram Singh, being a minor, is entitled to pre-empt and in the alternative he is at least entitled to pre-empt the share of Bisheshar Singh.

3. On the question whether Ram Singh as a minor member of the family is entitled to pre-empt it has been urged that no consent could be given on behalf of Ram Singh by the members of his family. We are not prepared to accept this argument as sound. In a joint Hindu family the karta can always act and does always act in the interest of the entire

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top