SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1921 Supreme(All) 278

C. J, GRIMWOOD MEARS
Nand Ram – Appellant
Versus
Khazan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Grimwood Mears, C.J. - This is an application in revision against an order of acquittal. Although there is no doubt that the High Court has the power to order a re-trial, it is a jurisdiction which should be exercised only in exceptional gases and with caution. It should only be done in cases where the alleged offence is of a serious character. If, however, a Judge comes to the opinion that there has been a miscarriage of justice, where, for instance, the lower Court has misquoted the evidence or where, having evidence before it which prima facie is reasonable and credible, the Judge of that Court gives no grounds whatever for rejecting it. In instances such as that there may well arise an inference either that the Judge has not acted with that propriety and care which is required in the decision of every case, be it civil or be it criminal. In such a case it would appear to be proper, after due examination of the facts, to make an order for re-trial.

2. On the evening of the 25th of September 1920, one Nand Ram, a zamindar, was riding home. On that evening he was greivously assaulted and as a result of that assault was feature in the case is that, whilst he was un-conscious

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top