SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(All) 329

A. K. KIRTY, C. D. PAREKH
Khema Kunwar – Appellant
Versus
Hemraj Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Rajeshji Verma, For the Appellant / G.P. Bhargava and H.P. Pant, For the Respondent

JUDGMENT

C.D. Parekh, J. - This Sp. A. No. 948 of 1967 connected with Sp. A. No. 949 of 1967 arises out of the order passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in writ petition No. 1789 of 1963 filed by Smt. Khema Kunwar against Harnam Singh connected with writ petition No. 2490 of 1963 filed by Smt. Khema Kunwar against Mohar Singh. In this appeal we are concerned only with writ petition No. 1789 of 1963 filed on September, 1963. In the writ petition Smt. Khema Kunwar, who is the Appellant in this special appeal, prayed for the issue a writ of certiorari quashing the orders of the Asstt. SO (C), DyDC camp at Budaun and the it Director of Consolidation, U.P. camp at Bareilly. The orders sought to be quashed were made as annexure D, E and G to the writ petition. Hemraj Singh Mohar Singh figure as Respondent No. 1 respectively in the two special appeals and, therefore, in the subsequent part of this judgment they have been referred to by me as such.

2. In the writ petition the facts as given out were that Harnam Singh, respondent no. I in this appeal, filed an objection u/S. 9 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act (hereinafter referred to as the UP CH Act) and claimed that he w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top