SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(All) 451

KIDWAI
Bisheshar Dyal – Appellant
Versus
Bhaiya Chandrabhan Dutt Ram – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. H.D. Srivastava, For the Appellant /

JUDGMENT

Kidwai J.

1. The appellants and their predecessors are sub-settlement-holders of village Bharwa in the district of Gonda. The superior proprietor of the village is Bhaiya Chandra Bhan Dutt Ram whose estate is now in the charge of the Deputy Commissioner, Gonda.

2. The superior proprietor instituted a suit out of which, this appeal arises for arrears of rent for the years 1349 to 1352 F. He claimed rent for the first three years at the rate of list 236 per annum together with RS. 21/8 par annum as local rate. For the last year he claimed Rs. 264 as rent plus Rs. 27 as local rate.

3. The defence was that no malikana was payable by the sub settlement holders under the decree of the first settlement court which was given upon an agreement of compromise between the predecessors of the parties. It was, therefore, urged that the rent indicated in the plaint included the local rate which also was 10 per cent of the land revenue payable in respect of the village.

4. The trial court accepted the defence and held that the rent assessed by the Settlement Officer at the third settlement included the local rate. He accordingly passed a decree for the amount claimed by the superior proprietor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top